CIRCUMCISION: Dads-4-Intact-Sons short comments

The following short statements were collected for this past Father’s Day. They were made by parents who either knew boys should be intact (so that they become intact men) OR  they researched the notable human rights violation of NON-MEDICAL, forever-pernicious, violent, unethical infant circumcision illegitimate surgery and quickly realized and fully understood that boys deserve to be intact just as girls are left intact in the US.

See these here:

https://storify.com/intactstory/dads4intact

[Because the person who set up the Dads4Intact website didn’t leave much time to read each statement, you’ll have to pause the automatic advance and then start it again for the next statement. Also, to read all of the short statement, look for and use the scroll slider at the usual right side of each message box.]

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Circumcision - Men Do Complain

Richard Duncker, chair of the UK charity, Genital Autonomy, and founder of, Men Do Complain, speaks candidly of how genital surgery, forced upon him as an infant, has impacted his life, and discusses his work to bring an end to this abuse of senseless, violent, forever-harmful, unethical, NON-MEDICAL infant circumcision illegitimate surgery, a notable human rights violation.
(Recorded in Helsinki, Finland, Oct. 2012)

Compared to the US, non-medical (but inflicted anyway) infant circumcision invalid surgery was never a big, awful problem in the UK. Before 1950, it was spotty in the UK, only done in scattered areas. Most UK doctors were of course intact. In 1949, a British doctor — Douglas Gairdner — wrote a 1949 landmark article, The Fate of the Foreskin: A Study of Circumcision, which was described as “a model of perceptive and pungent writing.” It concluded that if circumcision became uncommon it would result in “the saving of about 16 children’s lives lost from circumcision each year in this country…”According to Jewish anti-circumcision expert, the late Edward Wallerstein, the article “began to affect the practice of circumcision by the British”. Gairdner was pleased with the success of the article. Since the UK was developing National Health Care after the end of World War II, and because of the Gairdner article, the National Health Care service refused to pay for infant circumcision and therefore it ended in the UK: Brits born since 1950 are intact. [If all US insurance companies refused to pay for infant circumcision, this refusal would bring a rapid decline in this horrendous, vile practice in the US.]


GENITAL AUTONOMY
http://www.GenitalAutonomy.org

NORM UK
http://www.norm-uk.org

Men Do Complain
http://www.MenDoComplain.com

Global Survey of Circumcision Harm
http://www.CircumcisionHarm.org

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The Great Penis Ripoff in the US

3 Bloodstained Men by White House

Above: Three Bloodstained Men by the White House, Washington, DC

CIRCUMCISION: With your purchase, Amazon.com donates to IntactAmerica.org

If you now and then buy items from Amazon.com and you’re for intact boys and against senseless, violent, lifelong-harmful, unethical, NON-MEDICAL infant circumcision invalid surgery, Amazon.com will donate 0.5% of your purchase to IntactAmerica.org

Have you heard about AmazonSmile? If you select the organization IntactAmerica.org, every time you make a purchase at Amazon.com, they’ll make a donation to Intact America! It doesn’t cost you anything extra, and every little bit helps IntactAmerica’s efforts to bring an end to infant circumcision. Just use this URL to find IntactAmerica.org on Amazon Smile (IntactAmerica will show up as the parent 501c3 organization, the Hudson Center for Health Equity & Quality):

http://bit.ly/SmileIntact

image

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

image

image

CIRCUMCISION- Seeking 18 year old men upset by circumcision forced on you at birth: WHAT YOU CAN DO ABOUT THIS!

image

If you’re an 18 year old man who was circumcised in the US at the time of your birth and you know (by your own awareness and self-education from readings, etc.) that this is a permanently damaging, lifelong harmful practice, contact one of the below because you can sue the doctor who cut off your normal foreskin when he/she circumcised you at birth. [Your birth records are still in the US hospital where you were born— you can get the name of the doctor from those records or from parents.]

These people below specialize in lawsuits due to infant circumcision:

Steven Svoboda, attorney
Attorneys for the Rights of the Child, www.arclaw.org
2961 Ashby Ave., Berkeley, CA 94705
arc@post.harvard.edu
Fax/Phone 510-827-5771

David J. Llewellyn, attorney
100 Peachtree St., N.W., Suite 2100
Atlanta, GA 30303
Office: 404-524-5626 
[To email Mr. Llewellyn, use contact method by his address, at
http://www.avvo.com/attorneys/30303-ga-david-llewellyn-495730.html ]

John Geisheker, attorney in Seattle
email: docdirector.geisheker@gmail.com


And for general information on this matter and for any new contact information, call or write to:

Marilyn Milos, RN
NOCIRC, www.NOCIRC.org
PO Box 2512, San Anselmo, CA 94979-2512
info@nocirc.org
Phone: 415-488-9883
Fax: 415-488-9660

Infant Circumcision: “What I Wish I Had Known” [famous composition by Marilyn Milos, RN]

image

This is a famous composition written by Marilyn Milos, RN, the nurse who founded NOCIRC.org, the National Organization of Circumcision Information Resource Centers.

This composition appears in the July/Aug. 1989 special issue in The Truth Seeker on “Crimes of Genital Mutilation”. One can read her piece there and read part or all of this remarkable and important issue. Go to

http://bit.ly/1q4C5Mf to read it on page 3.


Infant Circumcision: “What I Wish I Had Known”, by Marilyn Milos


I didn’t know what circumcision was when I consented to hllVe my three sons circumcised. My doctor had told me the surgery was a necessary health measure, that it didn’t hurt, and that it only took a moment to perform … like cutting the umbilical cord, I thought. I certainly wasn’t prepared when, in nursing school several years later, I saw the surgery for the first time.

We students filed into the newborn nursery to find a baby strapped spread-eagle to a plastic board on a counter top across the room. He was struggling against his restraints - tugging, whimpering, and then crying helplessly. No one was tending the infant, but when I asked my instructor if I could comfort him she said “Wait till the doctor gets here.” I wondered how a teacher of the healing arts could watch someone suffer and not offer assistance. I wondered about the doctor’s power which could intimidate others from following protective instincts. When he did arrive, I immediately asked the doctor it I could help the baby. He told me to put my finger into the baby’s mouth; I did, and the baby sucked. I stroked his little head and spoke softly to him. He began to relax -and was momentarily quiet.

The silence was soon broken by a piercing scream - the baby’s reaction to having his foreskin pinched and crushed as the doctor attached the clamp to his penis. The shriek intensified when the doctor inserted an instrument between the foreskin and the glans (head of the penis), tearing the two structures apart. (They are normally attached to each other during infancy so the foreskin can protect the sensitive glans from urine and feces.) The baby started shaking his head back and forth - the only part of his body free to move - as the doctor used another clamp to crush the foreskin lengthwise, which he then cut. This made the opening of the foreskin large enough to insert a circumcision instrument, the device used to protect the glans from being severed during the surgery.

The baby began to gasp and choke, breathless from his shrill continuous screams. How could anyone say circumcision is painless when the suffering is so obvious? My bottom lip began to quiver, tears filled my eyes and spilled over. I found my own sobs difficult to contain. How much longer could this go on?

During the next stage of the surgery, the doctor crushed the foreskin against the circumcision instrument and then, finally, amputated it. The baby was limp, exhausted, spent. I had not been prepared, nothing could have prepared me, for this experience. To see a part of this baby’s penis being cut off - without an anesthetic - was devastating. But eyen more shocking was the doctor’s comment, barely audible several octaves below the piercing screams of the baby, “There’s no medical reason for doing this.” I couldn’t believe my ears, my knees became weak, and I felt sick to my stomach. I couldn’t believe that medical professionals, dedicated to helping and healing, could inflict such pain and anguish on innocent babies unnecessarily.

What had I allowed my own babies to endure? and why?

The course of my life was changed on that day in 1979. I have now dedicated my life to bringing an end to this horrendous practice.


<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>


Copyright 1988, Reprinted with permission of the author.

Marilyn Milos is the mother of three circumcised boys, grandmother of one intact child and is the Director of NOCIRC.org, the National Organization of Circumcision Information Resource Centers. She has spoken widely and is frequently featured on radio and television shows across the United States, including the Phil Donahue Show. Her work has been covered by numerous newspapers and magazines, from the New York and London Times to small-town papers. On 9 April 1988, the California Nurse’s Association Region 9 presented Marilyn Milos, RN with its highest honor, the Maureen Ricke Award, “for her dedication and unwavering commitment to righting a wrong” and for her work on the behalf of children “to raise public consciousness about America’s most unnecessary surgery.”


image

Female & Male Genital Mutilation in the USA

Writer, Patricia Robinett speaks frankly of her experience with genital mutilation in America, and how circumcision affects us all.

A second edition of Robinett’s book, The Rape of Innocence is now available.

http://RapeOfInnocence.com

Robinett exposes a well kept secret, female circumcision / genital mutilation of little girls by American pediatricians. Robinett is a compassionate and skilled writer; her discovery of what happened to her and to countless US-born girls is gripping reading. Highly recommended!

[In 1996, the US correctly outlawed female genital mutilation (female circumcision) but to this day, boys born in the US are still not protected by law from sexual mutilation and the torture that comes with it.]

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

No matter how you slice it, male and female genital mutilations are BAD

Senselessly, needlessly cutting off parts of children

CIRCUMCISION: Sickening hyprocrite Orpah and the foreskin face cream she pushes

image

Here she is, the super-rich, sickening, revolting hypocrite Oprah giving away the very costly anti-wrinkle face cream made from foreskins stolen from baby boys.

Did you know that foreskins are big business in the cosmetics industry? Case in point: Oprah Winfrey endorsed SkinMedica’s TNS Recovery Complex, an anti-aging cream that contains cells derived from human foreskins.

The inventor of SkinMedica has actually said, “Foreskins were used because that is a common surgery and the skin is thrown away, so why not use it for benefits?”

WHAT ABOUT THE BENEFITS OF THE FORESKIN WHEN IT’S STILL ATTACHED TO THE BOY YOU STOLE IT FROM?

[Incidentally, SkinMedica is being sued because this costly face cream made from foreskins stolen from baby boys might cause cancer. See: http://bit.ly/1j5dNlo ]

Oprah’s a big hypocrite because while she rightly opposes FGM (female genital mutilation— all intactivists oppose FGM) she’s all for male sexual mutilation (MSM). Also, while she’s done programs on FGM, she refuses to do any program on MSM.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

image

CIRCUMCISION: good position statement from Danish Assn. of Medical Students (FADL)

image

This atheist is at least happy about the following news.

While Jews in Europe griped, complained, fumed and called nearly everyone under the Sun an “anti-semite” when their favorite, precious perversion of torturing and sexually mutilating helpless, healthy baby boys born to Jews and to non-Jews was about to be correctly outlawed in various European countries, it was finally only the Norwegian nurses association and now the Danish Association of Medical Students (FADL) who stood up for the boys and who rightly denounced the so-called religious right/rite to torture and sexually mutilate healthy boys.

Here’s the statement from the Danish Association of Medical Students (FADL), translated from the Danish:

Statement on the Ritual Circumcision of Boys

The Danish Association of Medical Students (FADL) Main Association

Tues. 24 June 2014

http://www.fadl.dk/fadldk/politik/fadl-mener/rituel-drengeomskaering/
(original in Danish)

Ritual circumcision of boys removes healthy and functional tissue from a helpless, healthy child, and the question of ritual circumcision of boys is therefore in its starting point not a health issue. The question of whether ritual boy circumcision should be legal or not, is rather an ethical issue and a question of rights. Therefore, physicians and medical students are on an equal footing with all others in the community, and take a stance on whether a person’s right to to their body should take precedence over religious and cultural traditions or not.

FADL believes that individuals have the right to decide on ritual circumcision, and that the right to an intact body should be independent of the individual’s sex. As girls already are guaranteed legal protection against ritual circumcision in Denmark, boys should also be guaranteed the same rights.

FADL wants this resolution to: express respect for children’s - both girls and boys - recognized constitutional right to safeguarding their bodily integrity; and will appeal to physicians and other health professionals to take an active
stance on whether to respect children and thus boys’ constitutional rights to an intact body by making use of their right to refuse to perform the ritual circumcision of boys.

FADL would like to stress that our approach to ritual boys circumcision is neither rooted in anti-Semitism nor Islamophobia. Men who have reached the age of majority [18 years], may even choose to be circumcised for religious or cultural reasons, if they wish to do so.

FADLs position is not about whether to circumcise or not. Our position is that each individual should have the choice.

- Kasper Gasbjerg, President of the Danish Association of Medical Students (FADL)

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

image

image

Above: Perverse, anti-human, violent, anti-sexual-pleasures, EVIL religion and the corrupt, dangerous, greedy, unethical business formerly called US medicine are in league with each other—> they’re partners in the crime of MSM, male sexual mutilation. The non-Jews in the business formerly called US medicine are TERRIFIED of the Jews in and outside of their boy-damaging/man-wounding business.

CIRCUMCISION: Sickening hyprocrite Orpah and the foreskin face cream she pushes

image

Here she is, the super-rich, sickening, revolting hypocrite Oprah giving away the very costly anti-wrinkle face cream made from foreskins stolen from baby boys.

Did you know that foreskins are big business in the cosmetics industry? Case in point: Oprah Winfrey endorsed SkinMedica’s TNS Recovery Complex, an anti-aging cream that contains cells derived from human foreskins.

The inventor of SkinMedica has actually said, “Foreskins were used because that is a common surgery and the skin is thrown away, so why not use it for benefits?”

WHAT ABOUT THE BENEFITS OF THE FORESKIN WHEN IT’S STILL ATTACHED TO THE BOY YOU STOLE IT FROM?

Oprah’s a big hypocrite because while she rightly opposes FGM (female genital mutilation) she’s all for male sexual mutilation (MSM). Also, while she’s done programs on FGM, she refuses to do any program on MSM.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

image